Narrowing an Academic Argument | Learn German in English

About This Lesson

Use Narrowing an Academic Argument to practice German conversation, pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, and quizzes.

Dialogue

Mein Essay stützt sich auf Forschung, aber die zentrale Argumentation wirkt unklar.

Mine eh-SAY shtuhtst zikh owf FOR-shoong, AH-ber dee tsen-TRAH-leh ar-goo-men-taht-TSYOHN veerkt oon-KLAHR. My essay draws on research, but the central argument feels unclear.

Die Belege sind relevant, aber die These braucht klarere Grenzen.

Dee beh-LAY-keh zint reh-leh-VAHNT, AH-ber dee TAY-zeh browkht KLAR-eh-reh GREN-tsen. The evidence is relevant, yet the claim needs sharper boundaries.

Ich glaube, ich versuche, zu viele Fragen zu beantworten.

Ikh GLOW-beh, ikh fehr-ZOO-kheh, tsoo FEE-leh FRAH-gen tsoo beh-ANT-vor-ten. I think I am trying to answer too many questions.

Das passiert oft, wenn das Thema interessant, aber weit gefasst ist.

Dahn pah-SEE-ert oft, ven das TAY-mah in-teh-reh-SAHNT, AH-ber vite geh-FAHST ist. That often happens when the topic is interesting but broad.

Wie kann ich es eingrenzen, ohne es zu stark zu vereinfachen?

Vee kahn ikh es EYN-gren-tsen, OH-neh es tsoo shtahrk tsoo fehr-EYN-fakh-en? How can I narrow it without making it simplistic?

Wähle einen Spannungsaspekt, der in mehreren Quellen vorkommt.

VEH-leh EYE-nen SHPAN-noongs-as-PEKT, dair in MEHR-er-en KVEL-en FOR-komt. Choose one tension that appears across several sources.

Dann kann ich Perspektiven vergleichen, ohne den Hauptpunkt aus den Augen zu verlieren.

Dahn kan ikh pehr-spehk-TEE-ven fehr-GLY-khen, OH-neh den HOWPT-punkt ows den OW-gen tsoo fehr-LEE-ren. Then I can compare perspectives without losing the main point.

Dieser Fokus sorgt dafür, dass jeder Absatz dieselbe These unterstützt.

DEE-zair FOH-koos zorgt da-FYOOR, dass YAY-der AP-tsats DEE-zel-beh TAY-zeh oon-ter-SHTUHTST. That focus will make each paragraph support the same claim.

Word by Word

Mein “Mein” means “my” here and identifies the essay as belonging to the speaker. It comes before the noun “Essay”; the same possessive pattern can identify a person’s or thing’s connection to another noun.

Essay “Essay” means an essay, the piece of academic writing being discussed. Here it is the subject of the expression “Mein Essay stützt sich auf Forschung”; use it when referring to this type of written academic work.

stützt “stützt” means “relies on” or “draws on” in “stützt sich auf Forschung”. It is the form used with the reflexive expression “sich auf etwas stützen”, followed here by “Forschung”.

sich “sich” is the reflexive component of “stützt sich auf Forschung”, showing that the essay relies on something. It belongs with “stützt” and “auf”, so the reusable expression is “sich auf etwas stützen” when describing a basis or source.

auf “auf” introduces what the essay relies on in “stützt sich auf Forschung”. In this expression, it is followed by the supporting source or basis.

Forschung “Forschung” means research, the material on which the essay relies. It follows “stützt sich auf”; use it when discussing academic evidence or investigation.

aber “aber” means “but” and introduces a contrast between the essay’s research basis and its unclear argument. It connects two contrasting statements, as in “stützt sich auf Forschung, aber …”.

die “die” means “the” before “zentrale Argumentation”. It identifies a specific argument already connected with the essay; definite articles commonly introduce a specific noun in this way.

zentrale “zentrale” means “central” and describes the argument that is most important to the essay. It comes directly before “Argumentation”, so the adjective narrows which argument is meant.

Argumentation “Argumentation” means the argument or line of reasoning being presented in the essay. Here it is described as “zentrale” and is evaluated with “wirkt unklar”; use it when discussing how an academic argument is organized or expressed.

wirkt “wirkt” means “seems” or “appears” in “wirkt unklar”. It presents the speaker’s impression of the argument rather than stating that it is objectively unclear; “wirkt” can introduce an adjective describing an impression.

unklar “unklar” means unclear and describes how the central argument appears. It follows “wirkt”, a useful pattern for describing how something comes across to the speaker.

Belege “Belege” means evidence or supporting pieces of evidence. Here the evidence is said to be relevant; use this word in academic discussion when referring to material that supports a claim.

sind “sind” means “are” and links “Die Belege” with the description “relevant”. It is the form of “sein” used with this plural subject; the same linking pattern describes qualities of several things.

relevant “relevant” means relevant to the claim or discussion. Here it describes “Die Belege” through “sind”; use it when evidence has a meaningful connection to the topic.

These “These” means the claim or thesis that the essay needs to define more sharply. Here it is the thing that needs clearer boundaries; use it when referring to a central academic proposition.

braucht “braucht” means “needs” in “Die These braucht klarere Grenzen”. It expresses that the claim requires something in order to become clearer; the pattern is “etwas braucht etwas” for a need or requirement.

klarere “klarere” means clearer and describes the boundaries the claim needs. It compares the desired boundaries with their current level of clarity; it comes before the noun “Grenzen”.

Grenzen “Grenzen” means boundaries or limits for the claim. Here it refers to defining what the thesis covers and what it does not; use it when narrowing the scope of an argument or topic.

Ich “Ich” means “I” and identifies the speaker as the person making the statement. It appears at the beginning of the sentence here and is also used in “Ich glaube” to introduce the speaker’s view.

glaube “glaube” means “think” or “believe” in “Ich glaube”. It introduces the speaker’s assessment that follows; use “Ich glaube” when presenting an opinion or personal judgment.

versuche “versuche” means “am trying” or “try” in “ich versuche, zu viele Fragen zu beantworten”. It describes an effort and is followed here by a “zu” infinitive construction.

zu The first “zu” marks the infinitive “zu beantworten” after “versuche”. It connects the attempt with the action being attempted; the pattern is “versuchen, etwas zu tun”.

viele “viele” means “many”, and in “zu viele Fragen” the complete phrase means “too many questions”. It comes before the plural noun “Fragen”; “zu viele” describes an amount that is excessive for the purpose.

Fragen “Fragen” means questions, specifically the questions the speaker is trying to answer. It appears after “zu viele” and before “zu beantworten”; use it when discussing the issues an essay or investigation addresses.

beantworten “beantworten” means “answer” and completes “zu viele Fragen zu beantworten”. It is the action directed at “Fragen”; the reusable pattern is “Fragen beantworten” for answering questions.

Das “Das” means “that” and refers to the situation just described: trying to answer too many questions. In “Das passiert oft”, it serves as the subject of a general comment about that situation.

passiert “passiert” means “happens” in “Das passiert oft”. It describes an event or situation occurring; use it with a subject such as “Das” when commenting that something occurs.

oft “oft” means often and says that the situation happens frequently. It modifies “passiert” here; use it to describe repeated or common occurrences.

wenn “wenn” means “when” here and introduces the condition or situation in which something often happens. It begins the subordinate clause “wenn das Thema interessant, aber weit gefasst ist”; use it to connect an event with a recurring circumstance.

Thema “Thema” means topic, referring to the subject of the essay. In “wenn das Thema interessant … ist”, it is described with adjectives; use it when discussing what an essay, conversation, or investigation is about.

interessant “interessant” means interesting and describes the topic. It is paired with “aber” to show that the topic can be interesting while also being broad; use it after a linking verb to evaluate a subject.

weit “weit” contributes the meaning “broad” in the expression “weit gefasst”. Together with “gefasst”, it describes a topic whose scope is broad rather than narrowly defined.

gefasst “gefasst” contributes the meaning “defined” or “framed” in “weit gefasst”. The whole expression “weit gefasst” means broadly framed; use it when describing the scope of a topic or argument.

ist “ist” means “is” and links “das Thema” with the descriptions “interessant” and “weit gefasst”. It is used here in the subordinate clause after “wenn”; the same structure describes a subject with one or more qualities.

Wie “Wie” means “how” and asks about the method for narrowing the argument. It begins the question “Wie kann ich es eingrenzen?”; use it to ask how an action can be carried out.

kann “kann” means “can” and expresses the possibility of narrowing the argument. It is followed by the subject “ich” and the infinitive “eingrenzen”; use this pattern to ask or state what someone is able to do.

es “es” means “it” and refers here to the essay’s argument or focus that the speaker wants to narrow. It is placed before the infinitive “einzugrenzen” in the question’s verb phrase; pronouns like this avoid repeating the topic.

eingrenzen “eingrenzen” means to narrow or limit the scope of something. Here it refers to making the argument more focused without making it simplistic; use it for narrowing a topic, claim, or area of discussion.

ohne “ohne” means “without” and introduces an action that should not happen while the argument is narrowed. Here it begins “ohne es zu stark zu vereinfachen”; use “ohne” with a “zu” infinitive construction to express an omitted or avoided action.

stark “stark” means “strongly” or “greatly” in “zu stark zu vereinfachen”. It modifies “vereinfachen” and indicates that the simplification should not go too far; use it before an action when describing its degree.

vereinfachen “vereinfachen” means to simplify, here referring to reducing the argument too much. It follows “zu stark” in the construction “ohne es zu stark zu vereinfachen”; use it when discussing making a complex idea simpler.

Wähle “Wähle” means “choose” and gives a direct instruction to select one tension. It is the command used in “Wähle einen Spannungsaspekt”; use it when advising one person to make a selection.

einen “einen” introduces one selected item in “einen Spannungsaspekt”. It comes before the masculine noun and marks the object of “Wähle”; this pattern selects one specific item from possible options.

Spannungsaspekt “Spannungsaspekt” means a point of tension or tension aspect in the argument. Here it is the single aspect that should be chosen because it appears across several sources; use it when identifying a meaningful tension within an academic discussion.

der “der” means “that” or “which” and introduces the relative clause describing “Spannungsaspekt”. It connects that selected aspect with the information that it appears in several sources.

in “in” means “in” here and introduces the sources where the tension aspect appears: “in mehreren Quellen”. It is used with a plural group of sources to locate the occurrence of the aspect.

mehreren “mehreren” means several and describes the number of sources. It appears before “Quellen” in “in mehreren Quellen”; use it when referring to more than one but not specifying an exact number.

Quellen “Quellen” means sources, such as the academic materials being compared. It follows “in mehreren” and identifies where the tension aspect appears; use it when referring to sources of information or evidence.

vorkommt “vorkommt” means “appears” or “occurs” in “der in mehreren Quellen vorkommt”. It describes the tension aspect as being present in several sources; in this relative clause, the verb appears at the end.

Dann “Dann” means “then” and presents comparing perspectives as the next step after choosing one tension. It links a preceding decision with its consequence or next action.

Perspektiven “Perspektiven” means perspectives or viewpoints. Here they are the viewpoints that can be compared after selecting a shared tension; use it when discussing different ways of understanding an issue.

vergleichen “vergleichen” means to compare and describes examining perspectives alongside one another. It follows the modal verb “kann” in “kann ich Perspektiven vergleichen”; use it when evaluating similarities and differences.

Hauptpunkt “Hauptpunkt” means the main point of the essay or argument. In the expression “den Hauptpunkt aus den Augen zu verlieren”, it is the central idea that should remain visible during comparison.

aus den Augen zu verlieren “aus den Augen zu verlieren” means “to lose sight of” something. In the dialogue, “aus” contributes the idea of being out of, “den Augen” refers to one’s sight or view, and “zu verlieren” means to lose; together they form the complete expression “den Hauptpunkt aus den Augen zu verlieren”. Use this construction when someone risks losing focus on an important point.

Dieser “Dieser” means “this” and points back to the focus just described. It identifies that focus as the one that will make every paragraph support the same claim; demonstratives like this refer to a specific previously mentioned item.

Fokus “Fokus” means focus, referring to the narrowed argumentative focus. Here it is the subject of “sorgt dafür, dass …”; use it when discussing the central direction of an essay or discussion.

sorgt “sorgt” means “ensures” or “makes sure” in the construction “sorgt dafür, dass …”. It expresses that the focus produces the result described in the following clause; use this construction to connect a measure or condition with its intended result.

dafür “dafür” contributes “for that” in “sorgt dafür, dass jeder Absatz …”. Together with “sorgt” and “dass”, it links the focus to the result that every paragraph supports the same claim.

dass “dass” means “that” and introduces the result clause after “sorgt dafür”. It connects the focus with the proposition “jeder Absatz dieselbe These unterstützt”; use it to introduce what someone ensures or states.

jeder “jeder” means each or every and emphasizes the paragraphs one by one. It comes before “Absatz” and shows that the stated support should apply to all paragraphs individually.

Absatz “Absatz” means paragraph, referring to each separate section of the essay. Here every paragraph is expected to support the same claim; use it when discussing the organization of written text.

dieselbe “dieselbe” means “the same” and shows that every paragraph supports one identical claim. It comes before “These”; use it when referring back to a specific item that remains unchanged.

unterstützt “unterstützt” means “supports” and describes what each paragraph does for the thesis. It appears at the end of the “dass” clause after “jeder Absatz dieselbe These”; use it when explaining how evidence or text contributes to a claim.

Grammar Points

sich auf + Akkusativ stützen

Der Essay stützt sich auf Forschung und Quellen.

Dair eh-SAY SHTUHTST zikh owf FOR-shoong oont KVEL-en.

The essay draws on research and sources.

The reflexive verb sich auf etwas stützen means “to draw on something.” The preposition auf takes the accusative here.

dafür sorgen, dass + Nebensatz

Der Hauptpunkt sorgt dafür, dass die Argumentation relevant wirkt.

Dair HOWPT-punkt zorgt da-FYOOR, dass dee ar-goo-men-taht-TSYOHN reh-leh-VAHNT veerkt.

The main point ensures that the argument seems relevant.

After dass, the conjugated verb goes to the end of the subordinate clause: dass die Argumentation relevant wirkt.

German Vocabulary

Argumentation noun

ar-goo-men-taht-TSYOHN argument; line of argument

Beleg noun

beh-LAYK piece of evidence Belege

Essay noun

eh-SAY essay

Forschung noun

FOR-shoong research

glauben verb

GLOW-ben to think; to believe glaube

Grenze noun

GREN-tseh boundary Grenzen

relevant adj

reh-leh-VAHNT relevant

sich auf etwas stützen verb

zikh owf ET-vahs SHTUHTS-en to draw on something; to rely on something stützt sich auf

These noun

TAY-zeh thesis; claim

unklar adj

oon-KLAHR unclear

versuchen verb

fehr-ZOO-khen to try versuche

wirken verb

VEER-ken to seem; to appear wirkt

Quiz

Spelling

Tap the letters to spell the word.

research

Show Answer

Forschung

thesis; claim

Show Answer

These

unclear

Show Answer

unklar

to seem; to appear

Show Answer

wirkt